I'm weird as shit but at least I'm not mean
Don't you hate it when you catch your roommates trying to eat your food when you explicitly told them it's yours
Don't you hate it when you catch your roommates trying to eat your food when you explicitly told them it's yours
what, if any, of your joints/bones pop or crack (other than your back)
fingers/toes
wrists/ankles
neck
knees
hips
elbows
collarbones
sternum
multiple (say in tags!)
are you guys ok???
i've experienced popping and cracking in all of the above so i wanna know how normal this is
Yall do NOT hop on a cosmetic surgery hate train during an ongoing campaign against trans Healthcare I am fucking begging
My tits didn't smaller themselves, fuckos. Either you believe in bodily autonomy or you fucking don't.
The sacred bond between trans people who've had plastics and cis people who have had plastics is fucking sacred and I will not tolerate anybody in the queer community trash-talking plastics no matter what it is and who is getting them and for what reason!!!
I want there to not be a line between 'costmetic' and 'necessary'. If there's a line, then insurance companies and whoever-the-fuck-else will decide everything is 'cosmetic'. That happened to me with getting my jaw rebuilt when I was A CHILD. 'oh it's cosmetic' My insurance wrangler lady and the surgeon had to write SEVERAL LETTERS to the damn insurance company detailing out just how graphically I would DIE if I did not get my face rebuilt before I was 18! If 'we won't pay for cosmetic plastics only necessary ones' wasn't a thing, that wouldn't have had to fucking happen!
So you know what? I don't want to hear the word 'cosmetic' out of anyone's mouth. it's ALL just plastics. And all plastics are still 100% the person's choice to get, I don't care what the reason is, all reasons are your business and should be honoured and that's as it should be. As Sweaterkittens said, you either believe in bodily autonomy or you fucking don't.
Signed,
A Transman who has had exclusively plastics for all FOUR major surgeries throughout his life.
> The Jerusalem Post
> Americans
You might wanna double check that one, just saying.
NASA is an American organisation even when foreign journalists report on them
NASA is calling it 34 meters, because NASA uses the metric system.
This article is by an Israeli journalist who apparently really likes borzois, and spends half the article infodumping about them.
I used to be in a creative writing group with the guy and I promise you this is absolutely normal for him.
Quite possibly the funniest thing you could have added to this post.
Shira Barzilay, A Crazy Night in the Museum, 2022
[id: a close-up edited photo of a hickey on a marble statue’s neck. end id]
let's be messy and imperfect and wonderful
[ID: marker art of a maned wolf coloured in deep oranges and reds beside messy handwritten text that reads "it doesn't have to be perfect and neither do you." The background is white, and the artist's signature reads @ watercolourcritters. End ID.]
Anonymous asked:
im having a really hard time trying to reconcile your idea of and ~this site’s~ idea of “perverts/degenerates” with my own history and notions of sexual violence? i know its really deep on a lot of levels wrt homophobia and dehumanization, i know how “perverts” on here are usually victims themselves and intensely interested in the social dynamics behind abuse, and so on like that but i feel like the ambiguous language and the openness about sexuality does tend to push the boundaries of consent in and of itself? likewise ideas about sexual fluidity pushing up against rape/conversion therapy rhetoric. i find a lot of the “theory” to be pretty straightforwardly coercive and i dont know how i can - or how anyone else has been able? - to divorce a “pervert” from someone you should keep your guard up against, someone who has a problem with boundaries, someone who makes the people around them - who did not consent to be part of this act - feel uncomfortable AND unsafe?
txttletale answered:
overwhelmingly, the people in the world who have problems with boundaries and a poor understanding of consent (&, v. importantly, the social power to make that other people’s problem) are straight men with a ‘vanilla/ordinary’ (normative) sexuality. like, a frat boy sexually harassing women on campus (which we can hopefully both agree is both a common occurence and a systemic institutional problem) is not demonstrating 'perversion’–he is displaying an extremely normalized form of sexuality that is broadly embraced by the larger social systems he’s a part of.
the point being that there’s absolutely no link between the 'perversion’ of someone’s sexual preferences and the likelihood that that person will be predatory or make people 'feel unsafe’ or 'feel uncomfortable’. there is nothing 'perverted’ about a man making an unsolicited comment about a part of a woman’s body that is societally considered attractive (e.g. “nice tits!”) but very obviously that is still going to create just as much of an unsafe environment as if he’d said, idk, “nice feet!”. you’re drawing a connection between two entirely disparate sets of behaviours, non-normative sexuality & crossing of boundaries/erosion of consent–when in fact the normative sexual paradigm in our culture is pretty profoundly coercive & dehumanizing & shaky on the importance of consent!
(and also it’s important to note that–frankly–'feeling uncomfortable’ is not a crime or a harm done. i’m sure you are asking this with good faith concern and i want to be very clear that you are never in the wrong for feeling uncomfortable. however, lots of totally harmless and innocuous things in your life will make you feel uncomfortable–building a political platform off that is going to inevitably lead you to reactionary places.)
and i’m not going to touch on your equation of sexual fluidity to 'rape or conversion therapy rhetoric’ except to say that fundamentally it is not rhetoric that creates coercive sexual situations. it is real existing material & social power imbalances that create these situations. any rhetoric that then justifies the situation is produced post-hoc based on the material conditions that created it. if there is a coercive relationship, the person with the power can use any rhetoric to justify anything they like–the problem there does not lie in the 'theory’, just as it does not lie in the 'perversion’, it lies in the material facts of the situation.
My main issue with Sweden winning honestly isn't even about the song, it's the fact that the professional jury consistently rewards non-offensive pop music and punishes entries that are even slightly out there. Sweden just happens to be very good at making non-offensive pop music, which is why they win the jury vote so often.
The problem with that is that it encourages countries to send in non-offensive pop music in order to appeal to the professional jury, most of which will be very mediocre and boring to watch. If the people didn't get a vote, we wouldn't see entries like Finland or Croatia, and that's bullshit! Those kinds of performances are what people watch eurovision for! Nobody wants to see a non-offensive pop music contest. We want originality! We want fun! We want the professional jury to go fuck themselves!
Anyway cha cha cha should have won and I will die on this hill
[ID: a link preview of a stock image coffee table with a laptop with the facebook logo on the screen with text on top that says 'anyone who used facebook in the last 16 years can now get settlement money. here's how." end ID]
Filing a claim takes less than ten minutes, and can be done HERE
Excerpt from article:
Anyone in the U.S. who used Facebook in the last 16 years can now collect a piece of a $725 million settlement by parent company Meta tied to privacy violations — as long as they fill out a claim on a website set up to pay out money to the social network's users.
The settlement stems from multiple lawsuits that were brought against Facebook by users who claimed that the company improperly shared their data with third-party sources such as advertisers and data brokers. The litigation began after Facebook was embroiled in a privacy scandal in 2018 with Cambridge Analytica, which scraped user data from the site as part of an effort to profile voters.
Meta denied any liability or wrongdoing under the settlement, according to the recently created class-action website. However, the agreement means that U.S. residents who used Facebook between May 24, 2007, and December 22, 2022, can file a monetary claim as long as they do so before August 25, 2023.
Please reblog to signal boost this! As many people as possible should know about this to make their claim, if you don't do anything you don't get anything. It takes less than ten minutes to file and pick your payment option including pay/pal and ven/mo .
This is your chance to get money back from the evil fucking company! They have to fucking pay you now because they've been stealing your data and selling it for a profit!